Apple Loses Bid to Pause App Store Injunction Over External Links

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has denied Apple's emergency motion for a partial stay of a lower court's injunction, which had imposed new restrictions on the company's App Store practices regarding external purchase links. The ruling, issued June 4, 2025, means Apple must continue to comply with the stricter terms while its broader appeal in the ongoing case with Epic Games proceeds.Apple had filed the emergency motion on May 7, 2025, seeking to suspend specific prohibitions from the new injunction imposed by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on April 30, 2025. These included rules preventing Apple from charging commissions on purchases made via external links and from setting conditions on the language, placement, or flow of buttons and links directing users to those external options.In its decision, the Ninth Circuit panel, consisting of S.R. Thomas and M. Smith, Circuit Judges, and McShane, Chief District Judge, stated, "In deciding whether to impose a stay, we consider: '(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.'" The court concluded, "Apple 'bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of [our] discretion.' After reviewing the relevant factors, we are not persuaded that a stay is appropriate." The court also granted outstanding motions for leave to file amicus briefs.Continue ReadingShare Article:Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, EmailFollow iClarified:Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Newsletter, App Store, YouTube

Jun 5, 2025 - 10:20

Apple Loses Bid to Pause App Store Injunction Over External Links

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has denied Apple's emergency motion for a partial stay of a lower court's injunction, which had imposed new restrictions on the company's App Store practices regarding external purchase links. The ruling, issued June 4, 2025, means Apple must continue to comply with the stricter terms while its broader appeal in the ongoing case with Epic Games proceeds.

Apple had filed the emergency motion on May 7, 2025, seeking to suspend specific prohibitions from the new injunction imposed by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on April 30, 2025. These included rules preventing Apple from charging commissions on purchases made via external links and from setting conditions on the language, placement, or flow of buttons and links directing users to those external options.

In its decision, the Ninth Circuit panel, consisting of S.R. Thomas and M. Smith, Circuit Judges, and McShane, Chief District Judge, stated, "In deciding whether to impose a stay, we consider: '(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.'" The court concluded, "Apple 'bears the burden of showing that the circumstances justify an exercise of [our] discretion.' After reviewing the relevant factors, we are not persuaded that a stay is appropriate." The court also granted outstanding motions for leave to file amicus briefs.

Continue Reading

Share Article:
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Email

Follow iClarified:
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Newsletter, App Store, YouTube