Understanding .map() vs .flat_map() in Rust with a Simple Analogy

Understanding .map() vs .flat_map() in Rust with a Simple Analogy Different between .map() and .flat_map() in RUST fn main() { let numbers = vec![1, 2, 3]; // Using `map()` let mapped: Vec = numbers.iter().map(|&n| vec![n, n * 10]).collect(); println!("{:?}", mapped); // [[1, 10], [2, 20], [3, 30]] // Using `flat_map()` let flat_mapped: Vec = numbers.iter().flat_map(|&n| vec![n, n * 10]).collect(); println!("{:?}", flat_mapped); // [1, 10, 2, 20, 3, 30] } .map(): Each item stays in its own package (nested boxes) Imagine you order 3 items, and the delivery guy wraps each item separately inside its own package. .flat_map(): The delivery guy removes extra boxes (flattens them) Instead of putting each item in a separate box, he puts everything in one big box—no extra packaging! Use .map() when you still want to keep items separate (nested lists). Use .flat_map() when you want to merge everything into one (remove nesting). PICTUTRE FOR MORE DETAILS

Feb 23, 2025 - 16:46

Understanding .map() vs .flat_map() in Rust with a Simple Analogy

Different between .map() and .flat_map() in RUST

fn main() {
    let numbers = vec![1, 2, 3];

    // Using `map()`
    let mapped: Vec> = numbers.iter().map(|&n| vec![n, n * 10]).collect();
    println!("{:?}", mapped); // [[1, 10], [2, 20], [3, 30]]

    // Using `flat_map()`
    let flat_mapped: Vec = numbers.iter().flat_map(|&n| vec![n, n * 10]).collect();
    println!("{:?}", flat_mapped); // [1, 10, 2, 20, 3, 30]
}

.map(): Each item stays in its own package (nested boxes)
Imagine you order 3 items, and the delivery guy wraps each item separately inside its own package.

.flat_map(): The delivery guy removes extra boxes (flattens them)
Instead of putting each item in a separate box, he puts everything in one big box—no extra packaging!

Use .map() when you still want to keep items separate (nested lists).

Use .flat_map() when you want to merge everything into one (remove nesting).

PICTUTRE FOR MORE DETAILS