Microsoft Is the Best (But Slow), IBM Beats Most of OpenAI: What I Found Testing 50+ LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are everywhere now – GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini, LLaMA, Mistral, and more. Everyone talks about which is "the best," but surprisingly, real side-by-side performance comparisons are rare. So, I built one myself. I tested over 50 LLMs – both cloud-based and local – on my own hardware, using real-world developer tasks. And the results? Shocking. Microsoft's Phi-4 was the most accurate model overall (yes, a local model!). IBM’s Granite models outperformed many of OpenAI’s most hyped offerings. Speed vs. accuracy is a serious tradeoff – and the best choice depends on your workflow. Here's a breakdown of how I tested, what I found, and how you can pick the right model.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are everywhere now – GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini, LLaMA, Mistral, and more. Everyone talks about which is "the best," but surprisingly, real side-by-side performance comparisons are rare. So, I built one myself.
I tested over 50 LLMs – both cloud-based and local – on my own hardware, using real-world developer tasks. And the results? Shocking.
- Microsoft's Phi-4 was the most accurate model overall (yes, a local model!).
- IBM’s Granite models outperformed many of OpenAI’s most hyped offerings.
- Speed vs. accuracy is a serious tradeoff – and the best choice depends on your workflow.
Here's a breakdown of how I tested, what I found, and how you can pick the right model.