A Journey from AI to LLMs and MCP - 3 - Boosting LLM Performance — Fine-Tuning, Prompt Engineering, and RAG

Free Resources Free Apache Iceberg Course Free Copy of “Apache Iceberg: The Definitive Guide” 2025 Apache Iceberg Architecture Guide How to Join the Iceberg Community Iceberg Lakehouse Engineering Video Playlist Ultimate Apache Iceberg Resource Guide In our last post, we explored how LLMs process text using embeddings and vector spaces within limited context windows. While LLMs are powerful out-of-the-box, they aren’t perfect—and in many real-world scenarios, we need to push them further. That’s where enhancement techniques come in. In this post, we’ll walk through the three most popular and practical ways to boost the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs): Fine-tuning Prompt engineering Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Each approach has its strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases. By the end, you’ll know when to use each—and how they work under the hood. 1. Fine-Tuning — Teaching the Model New Tricks Fine-tuning is the process of training an existing LLM on custom datasets to improve its behavior on specific tasks. How it works: You take a pre-trained model (like GPT or LLaMA). You feed it new examples in a structured format (instructions + completions). The model updates its internal weights based on this new data. Think of it like giving the model a focused education after it’s graduated from a general AI university. When to use it: You want a custom assistant that uses your company’s voice You need the model to perform a specialized task (e.g., legal analysis, medical diagnostics) You have recurring, structured inputs that aren’t handled well with prompting alone Trade-offs: Pros Cons Highly accurate for specific tasks Expensive (compute + time) Reduces prompt complexity Risk of overfitting or forgetting Works well offline or locally Not ideal for frequently changing data Fine-tuning is powerful, but it’s not always the first choice—especially when you need flexibility or real-time knowledge. 2. Prompt Engineering — Speaking the Model’s Language Sometimes, you don’t need to retrain the model—you just need to talk to it better. Prompt engineering is the art of crafting inputs that guide the model to behave the way you want. It’s fast, flexible, and doesn’t require model access. Prompting patterns: Zero-shot prompting: Just ask a question > “Summarize this article.” Few-shot prompting: Show examples > “Here’s how I want you to respond…” Chain-of-Thought (CoT): Encourage reasoning > “Let’s think step by step…” Tools and techniques: Templates: Reusable format strings with variables Constraints: “Answer in JSON” or “Limit to 100 words” Personas: “You are a helpful legal assistant...” System prompts (where supported): Define role and tone When to use it: You’re working with a hosted LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) You want to avoid infrastructure and cost overhead You need to quickly iterate and improve outcomes Trade-offs: Pros Cons Fast to test and implement Sensitive to wording Doesn’t require model access Can be brittle or unpredictable Great for prototyping Doesn’t scale well for complex logic Prompt engineering is like UX for AI—small changes in input can completely change the output. 3. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) — Give the Model Real-Time Knowledge RAG is a game-changer for context-aware applications. Instead of cramming all your knowledge into a model, RAG retrieves relevant information at runtime and includes it in the prompt. How it works: User sends a query System runs a semantic search over a vector database Top-matching documents are inserted into the prompt The LLM generates a response using both query + retrieved context This gives you dynamic, real-time access to external knowledge—without retraining. Typical RAG architecture: User → Query → Vector Search (Embeddings) → Top K Documents → LLM Prompt → Response Use case examples: Chatbots that answer questions from company docs Developer copilots that can search codebases LLMs that read log files, support tickets, or PDFs Trade-offs: Pros Cons Real-time access to changing data Adds latency due to search layer No need to retrain the model Requires infrastructure (DB + search) Keeps context windows lean Needs good chunking & ranking logic With RAG, your LLM becomes a smart interface to your data—not just the internet. Choosing the Right Enhancement Technique Here’s a quick cheat sheet to help you choose: Goal Best Technique Specialize a model on internal tasks Fine-tuning Guide output or behavior flexibly Prompt engineering Inject dynamic, real-time knowledge Retrieval-Augmented Gen Often, the best systems combine these techniques: Fine-tuned base model With prompt templates And external knowledge via RAG This is exac

Apr 5, 2025 - 23:41

A Journey from AI to LLMs and MCP - 3 - Boosting LLM Performance — Fine-Tuning, Prompt Engineering, and RAG

Free Resources

In our last post, we explored how LLMs process text using embeddings and vector spaces within limited context windows. While LLMs are powerful out-of-the-box, they aren’t perfect—and in many real-world scenarios, we need to push them further.

That’s where enhancement techniques come in.

In this post, we’ll walk through the three most popular and practical ways to boost the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs):

Fine-tuning
Prompt engineering
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Each approach has its strengths, trade-offs, and ideal use cases. By the end, you’ll know when to use each—and how they work under the hood.

1. Fine-Tuning — Teaching the Model New Tricks

Fine-tuning is the process of training an existing LLM on custom datasets to improve its behavior on specific tasks.

How it works:

You take a pre-trained model (like GPT or LLaMA).
You feed it new examples in a structured format (instructions + completions).
The model updates its internal weights based on this new data.

Think of it like giving the model a focused education after it’s graduated from a general AI university.

When to use it:

You want a custom assistant that uses your company’s voice
You need the model to perform a specialized task (e.g., legal analysis, medical diagnostics)
You have recurring, structured inputs that aren’t handled well with prompting alone

Trade-offs:

Pros	Cons
Highly accurate for specific tasks	Expensive (compute + time)
Reduces prompt complexity	Risk of overfitting or forgetting
Works well offline or locally	Not ideal for frequently changing data

Fine-tuning is powerful, but it’s not always the first choice—especially when you need flexibility or real-time knowledge.

2. Prompt Engineering — Speaking the Model’s Language

Sometimes, you don’t need to retrain the model—you just need to talk to it better.

Prompt engineering is the art of crafting inputs that guide the model to behave the way you want. It’s fast, flexible, and doesn’t require model access.

Prompting patterns:

Zero-shot prompting: Just ask a question > “Summarize this article.”
Few-shot prompting: Show examples > “Here’s how I want you to respond…”
Chain-of-Thought (CoT): Encourage reasoning > “Let’s think step by step…”

Tools and techniques:

Templates: Reusable format strings with variables
Constraints: “Answer in JSON” or “Limit to 100 words”
Personas: “You are a helpful legal assistant...”
System prompts (where supported): Define role and tone

When to use it:

You’re working with a hosted LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
You want to avoid infrastructure and cost overhead
You need to quickly iterate and improve outcomes

Trade-offs:

Pros	Cons
Fast to test and implement	Sensitive to wording
Doesn’t require model access	Can be brittle or unpredictable
Great for prototyping	Doesn’t scale well for complex logic

Prompt engineering is like UX for AI—small changes in input can completely change the output.

3. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) — Give the Model Real-Time Knowledge

RAG is a game-changer for context-aware applications.

Instead of cramming all your knowledge into a model, RAG retrieves relevant information at runtime and includes it in the prompt.

How it works:

User sends a query
System runs a semantic search over a vector database
Top-matching documents are inserted into the prompt
The LLM generates a response using both query + retrieved context

This gives you dynamic, real-time access to external knowledge—without retraining.

Typical RAG architecture:

User → Query → Vector Search (Embeddings) → Top K Documents → LLM Prompt → Response

Use case examples:

Chatbots that answer questions from company docs
Developer copilots that can search codebases
LLMs that read log files, support tickets, or PDFs

Trade-offs:

Pros	Cons
Real-time access to changing data	Adds latency due to search layer
No need to retrain the model	Requires infrastructure (DB + search)
Keeps context windows lean	Needs good chunking & ranking logic

With RAG, your LLM becomes a smart interface to your data—not just the internet.

Choosing the Right Enhancement Technique

Here’s a quick cheat sheet to help you choose:

Goal	Best Technique
Specialize a model on internal tasks	Fine-tuning
Guide output or behavior flexibly	Prompt engineering
Inject dynamic, real-time knowledge	Retrieval-Augmented Gen

Often, the best systems combine these techniques:

Fine-tuned base model
With prompt templates
And external knowledge via RAG

This is exactly what advanced AI agent systems are starting to do—and it’s where we’re heading next.

Recap: Boosting LLMs Is All About Context and Control

Technique	What It Does	Ideal For
Fine-Tuning	Teaches model new behavior	Repetitive, specialized tasks
Prompt Engineering	Crafts effective inputs	Fast prototyping, hosted models
RAG	Adds knowledge dynamically at runtime	Large, evolving, external datasets

Up Next: What Are AI Agents — And Why They’re the Future

Now that we’ve learned how to enhance individual LLMs, the next evolution is combining them with tools, memory, and logic to create AI Agents.

In the next post, we’ll explore:

What makes something an AI agent
How agents orchestrate LLMs + tools
Why they’re essential for real-world use