Why do software projects fail despite having excellent code?
It's concerning how many developers obsess over code quality while missing the fundamental question: are we building what users actually need? Most of us have seen projects where teams spent weeks perfecting their architecture, choosing the latest frameworks, and arguing over the smallest of details on a pull request - only to deliver features that users never use.

It's concerning how many developers obsess over code quality while missing the fundamental question: are we building what users actually need?
Most of us have seen projects where teams spent weeks perfecting their architecture, choosing the latest frameworks, and arguing over the smallest of details on a pull request - only to deliver features that users never use.