Top 5 FeedBear Alternatives in 2025

Looking for a better alternative to FeedBear? Maybe you want more features, simpler pricing, or a fresh user experience. Below, we've rounded up five solid alternatives to help you easily manage user feedback, prioritize feature requests, and keep your customers happy. 1. UserJot: Simple, Beautiful User Feedback Management UserJot is a modern platform designed to help startups and product teams collect, organize, and act on user feedback. With its clean, easy-to-use interface, UserJot makes gathering suggestions, bug reports, and feature requests straightforward. It includes intuitive boards, voting, and built-in roadmaps to keep everyone informed. Thanks to smart tagging and moderation tools, organizing feedback is effortless. You can even publish updates directly through integrated changelogs, ensuring your users always know what's new. UserJot also offers seamless integrations, custom branding, and responsive support. Learn more at UserJot. Pros: Unlimited feedback posts and users even on the free plan. Users can post feedback without signing up (optional). Built-in public roadmaps and changelogs to keep users informed. Smart AI-powered tagging automatically organizes feedback. Custom domain and branding options available on paid plans. Easy integration with popular tools for smooth workflows. Transparent pricing with no hidden fees and responsive support. Pricing: Free: Unlimited posts/users, 2 feedback boards, 3 admin roles. Starter: $29/month, 5 boards, custom domain, branding, integrations. Professional: $59/month, unlimited boards/admins, priority support, Single Sign-On (SSO). 2. Upvoty Upvoty helps teams collect user feedback through customizable boards, voting, and roadmaps. It also includes changelogs to announce new features. Upvoty aims to make prioritizing customer requests simpler and more transparent. Pros: Easy-to-use feedback boards and voting system. Public roadmap keeps users engaged. Customizable branding and domain. Multiple integrations (Zapier, Slack, Jira). Reduces support load by clearly communicating feature status. Cons: Pricing can be unpredictable as user numbers grow. Some users report minor bugs and outdated design. Past issues with support responsiveness. Limited advanced moderation and management tools. Certain integrations only available on higher-priced plans. Pricing: POWER: $15/month, 1 project, basic features. SUPER: $49/month, integrations, changelog, advanced roadmap. HYPER: $99/month, 3 projects, all integrations, custom SSO, CSS. 3. Fider.io Fider.io is an open-source feedback platform letting users submit ideas, vote, and discuss. You can host it yourself or choose their affordable cloud service. It's simple, transparent, and community-driven. Pros: Completely open-source, allowing full customization. Free self-hosted version available. Simple, user-friendly interface. Affordable cloud-hosted option. Supports multiple languages and OAuth login. Cons: No built-in roadmap or changelog feature. Limited built-in moderation tools. Basic filtering and management options. Potential vulnerability to spam submissions. Support primarily through community forums. Pricing: Cloud: $30/month, unlimited feedback and users, custom domain, API. Self-hosted: Free (requires technical setup and maintenance). 4. Nolt.io Nolt.io is a straightforward feedback tool designed for easy idea collection, voting, and prioritization. It emphasizes simplicity and user engagement, offering basic customization and integrations. Pros: Very intuitive and easy to set up. Unlimited users and feedback on all plans. Anonymous voting and automated email updates. Good integration options (Slack, Jira, Zapier). Strong customer support reputation. Cons: Quickly becomes expensive if multiple boards are needed. No built-in changelog for announcements. Limited advanced analytics and moderation features. Customization options are somewhat limited. Some users report slow feature development. Pricing: Essential: $29/month, 1 board, basic integrations. Pro: $69/month, 5 boards, advanced integrations, moderation tools. Enterprise: Custom pricing, unlimited boards, advanced SSO. 5. Pendo.io Pendo.io combines feedback collection with analytics, in-app guides, and session recordings. It's a powerful, enterprise-focused tool aimed at improving the overall user experience. Pros: Comprehensive analytics and user behavior insights. In-app onboarding and guidance tools. Integrated feedback collection (surveys, NPS). Session replay feature for detailed user insights. Strong security and privacy standards. Cons: Pricing is high and not publicly available. Steep learning curve and complexity. Limited customization of in-app guides. Occasional data accuracy issues reported. N

Apr 6, 2025 - 04:42

Looking for a better alternative to FeedBear? Maybe you want more features, simpler pricing, or a fresh user experience. Below, we've rounded up five solid alternatives to help you easily manage user feedback, prioritize feature requests, and keep your customers happy.

1. UserJot: Simple, Beautiful User Feedback Management

UserJot is a modern platform designed to help startups and product teams collect, organize, and act on user feedback. With its clean, easy-to-use interface, UserJot makes gathering suggestions, bug reports, and feature requests straightforward. It includes intuitive boards, voting, and built-in roadmaps to keep everyone informed. Thanks to smart tagging and moderation tools, organizing feedback is effortless. You can even publish updates directly through integrated changelogs, ensuring your users always know what's new. UserJot also offers seamless integrations, custom branding, and responsive support. Learn more at UserJot.

Pros:

Unlimited feedback posts and users even on the free plan.
Users can post feedback without signing up (optional).
Built-in public roadmaps and changelogs to keep users informed.
Smart AI-powered tagging automatically organizes feedback.
Custom domain and branding options available on paid plans.
Easy integration with popular tools for smooth workflows.
Transparent pricing with no hidden fees and responsive support.

Pricing:

Free: Unlimited posts/users, 2 feedback boards, 3 admin roles.
Starter: $29/month, 5 boards, custom domain, branding, integrations.
Professional: $59/month, unlimited boards/admins, priority support, Single Sign-On (SSO).

2. Upvoty

Upvoty helps teams collect user feedback through customizable boards, voting, and roadmaps. It also includes changelogs to announce new features. Upvoty aims to make prioritizing customer requests simpler and more transparent.

Pros:

Easy-to-use feedback boards and voting system.
Public roadmap keeps users engaged.
Customizable branding and domain.
Multiple integrations (Zapier, Slack, Jira).
Reduces support load by clearly communicating feature status.

Cons:

Pricing can be unpredictable as user numbers grow.
Some users report minor bugs and outdated design.
Past issues with support responsiveness.
Limited advanced moderation and management tools.
Certain integrations only available on higher-priced plans.

Pricing:

POWER: $15/month, 1 project, basic features.
SUPER: $49/month, integrations, changelog, advanced roadmap.
HYPER: $99/month, 3 projects, all integrations, custom SSO, CSS.

3. Fider.io

Fider.io is an open-source feedback platform letting users submit ideas, vote, and discuss. You can host it yourself or choose their affordable cloud service. It's simple, transparent, and community-driven.

Pros:

Completely open-source, allowing full customization.
Free self-hosted version available.
Simple, user-friendly interface.
Affordable cloud-hosted option.
Supports multiple languages and OAuth login.

Cons:

No built-in roadmap or changelog feature.
Limited built-in moderation tools.
Basic filtering and management options.
Potential vulnerability to spam submissions.
Support primarily through community forums.

Pricing:

Cloud: $30/month, unlimited feedback and users, custom domain, API.
Self-hosted: Free (requires technical setup and maintenance).

4. Nolt.io

Nolt.io is a straightforward feedback tool designed for easy idea collection, voting, and prioritization. It emphasizes simplicity and user engagement, offering basic customization and integrations.

Pros:

Very intuitive and easy to set up.
Unlimited users and feedback on all plans.
Anonymous voting and automated email updates.
Good integration options (Slack, Jira, Zapier).
Strong customer support reputation.

Cons:

Quickly becomes expensive if multiple boards are needed.
No built-in changelog for announcements.
Limited advanced analytics and moderation features.
Customization options are somewhat limited.
Some users report slow feature development.

Pricing:

Essential: $29/month, 1 board, basic integrations.
Pro: $69/month, 5 boards, advanced integrations, moderation tools.
Enterprise: Custom pricing, unlimited boards, advanced SSO.

5. Pendo.io

Pendo.io combines feedback collection with analytics, in-app guides, and session recordings. It's a powerful, enterprise-focused tool aimed at improving the overall user experience.

Pros:

Comprehensive analytics and user behavior insights.
In-app onboarding and guidance tools.
Integrated feedback collection (surveys, NPS).
Session replay feature for detailed user insights.
Strong security and privacy standards.

Cons:

Pricing is high and not publicly available.
Steep learning curve and complexity.
Limited customization of in-app guides.
Occasional data accuracy issues reported.
No dedicated mobile app for admins.

Pricing:

Free: Up to 500 monthly active users, basic analytics.
Paid Plans: Custom quotes required, typically expensive (often over $25,000/year).

Choosing the Right Alternative

Each of these tools has its strengths. Here's a quick guide based on your priorities:

Best Value & Simplicity: UserJot or Fider.io
Most Customization & Open Source: Fider.io
Enterprise-Level Analytics & Guidance: Pendo.io
Balance of Features & Price: UserJot or Nolt.io
Multiple Integrations: UserJot, Nolt.io, or Upvoty

When choosing, consider your team's size, budget, required features, and how much customization you need. UserJot stands out as a particularly strong choice for teams looking for ease of use, great value, and a modern, user-friendly experience.